我可以問不倒Q&A專欄(2024年8月)


 我可以問不倒 

(2024年8月1日起)

本Q&A專欄使用原則:
1.優先提供OKE美語之新舊學員任何有關英語學習之提問。
2. 為提供最符合大眾共同學習效益,每周OKE美語及旋元佑老師將均衡選取三則提問給予詳解。
3.提問請點擊右側標籤列#我可以問不倒,至當月份的文章版面。
此篇文章僅供2024.8.01-2024.8.31提問使用











OKE旋元佑老師課程資訊

留言

  1. 老師您好
    For priests to violate our children and have their acts covered up by their peers is a crime of the highest degree.
    1 For ... peers=That priests violate our children and have their acts covered up by their peers ?

    The killing of innocent people--be they Israelis or Palestinians--should be condemned.
    2 be they Israelis or Palestinians=whether they are Israelis or Palestinians?

    It's hard to understand how he could have been rejected.
    3 從文章中的上下文知道, 他事實上被拒絕了. 可是句子為什麼是用猜測語氣could have been ?
    謝謝老師

    回覆刪除
    回覆
    1. 1
      That priests "should" violate our children and have their acts covered up by their peers,這裏的should意思是「竟然」,減化就成為不定詞
      2
      是。用be是採用了命令句語氣,就是let them be的味道
      3
      意思是「當時怎麼會有可能…」,所以是猜測語氣

      旋

      刪除
  2. 老師您好
    The knottier problem is divining his motives
    1 divining his motives 可以替換成 to divine his motives且不改變句子的意思?

    What the Street fears most is having to duplicate the analytical staff on its banking side
    2 having to duplicate 可以替換成 to have to duplicate且不改變句子的意思 ?

    organic explanation
    3 organic=basic, structural ?

    "He just turned up last year in Tokyo and asked if I want to make a movie the next day. We don't even speak a common language, but I thought why the hell not.''
    4why the hell not=why not ? why the hell not是比較粗俗的用法嗎
    謝謝老師

    回覆刪除
    回覆
    1. 1
      這裏的divining...是名詞補語,句主詞the problem全等。若要用to V,最好改為:The knottier question is how to divine his motives,這樣比較符合全等要求
      2
      用having to比較好,原因同上
      3
      大概是吧。另外還有「完整」的暗示
      4
      是

      旋

      刪除
  3. 老師您好
    "I hate these reality TV shows" "Ditto. What's on the other side?"
    1 What's on the other side 的意思是?

    Recent economic growth has been nothing less than spectacular
    2 nothing less than的意思是至少, nothing less than spectacular至少很驚人=相當驚人?

    3 The knottier problem is divining his motives 不能改成to V的形式。之前有看過 The plan is to V的形式,那為什麼不能改成The plan is V-ing的形式 ?
    謝謝老師

    回覆刪除
    回覆
    1. 1
      大概是「反方面的論點如何?」,亦即What do people like about these shows?
      2
      是
      3
      plan「計畫」說的是將來要怎麼做,帶有很重的不確定語氣,所以用to V。problem則沒有這種暗示

      旋

      刪除
  4. 特斯拉的使命“Accelerating the World's Transition to Sustainable Energy”(https://www.tesla.com/about),在台灣翻譯為“加速全球轉向永續能源”,在香港/澳門翻譯為“推動全球轉向使用可持續能源”,而在中國大陸翻譯為“加速世界向可持續能源的轉變”。

    我認為,“世界”和“可持續能源”並不對等,世界不能向可持續能源轉變,而“世界能源”和“可持續能源”是對等的概念(都是能源範疇)。因此,“世界能源”可以向“可持續能源”轉變。

    請問:
    1. 這句話是否省略了什麼內容?是否應該還原為“Accelerating the World's (Energy) Transition to Sustainable Energy”以更準確地表達意思?
    2. “Accelerate the World's (Energy) Transition to Sustainable Energy”如何分析句子成分?是不是S (省略主詞We)-V (Accelerate)-O [the World's (Energy) Transition] to Sustainable Energy,其中,to Sustainable Energy是介系詞片語?

    回覆刪除
    回覆
    1. 1
      transition from ... to ...不是比較級,也不是對等連接詞,並不要求對等。例如可以說Taiwan's transition from a labor-intensive to a high-tech form of economy
      2
      Accelerating(V) the World's Transition(O) to Sustainable Energy這是個動名詞片語,並非完整的句子,所以沒有主詞。後面的to sustainable energy是介系詞片語,修飾transition

      旋

      刪除
  5. 老師在[2024年8月25日 晚上7:28]回復說:
    1
    transition from ... to ...不是比較級,也不是對等連接詞,並不要求對等。例如可以說Taiwan's transition from a labor-intensive to a high-tech form of economy

    請問,老師的回復,是指Accelerating the World's Transition to Sustainable Energy.是Accelerating the World's Transition (from unsustainable energy) to Sustainable Energy.的省略嗎?省略了from unsustainable energy?

    回覆刪除
    回覆
    1. 對。那句沒有說from where,只說to where

      旋

      刪除
  6. 老師您好
    There's no sense in waiting (= it is not practical to wait) - the next train isn't for two hours.
    1 the next train isn't有省略什麼字嗎

    Travelers to Dubai are being cautioned against being under the influence of alcohol, even if one consumes it on the flights over
    2 over 的意思是 ?

    The pharma giant Remedica, of which the key products have generated enormous revenues, is a research-based company
    3 of which the key products跟the key products of which 兩種寫法有何不同 ?兩種寫法可以相通嗎 ?
    謝謝老師

    回覆刪除
    回覆
    1. 1
      意思看得出來,大約是isn't coming for 2 hours
      2
      on the flight over (here)「在來此的班機上」
      3
      兩種寫法都對,意思相同

      旋

      刪除

張貼留言

◆請選擇提問當月份的留言板提問◇